| Inside Scoop | Breaking News | Video | Blog Index | Participate | Humor | |
| Politics | Economics | New Media | Travel and Lifestyle | Technology | Education | Green Living |
Reuters published an article on Sunday focusing on political, economic, and governance risks in Thailand. The article presents surveys from IHS Global Insight, World Bank, and Economist Intelligence Unit. In the IHS Global Insight survey, Thailand ranks last among the three other countries (Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines) listed in terms of perceived political risk for companies. It ranks higher (tied for 2nd) in tax and legal categories, but lower (tied for 3rd) in the economic, operational, and security categories. In the World Bank governance indicators suvey, Thailand's relative world ranking has fallen over the last four years in most categories. Its regional ranking for political stability has also fallen markedly during the same period. Finally, in the EIU survey, Thailand rates very poorly on perceived vulnerability to unrest. The results of the surveys have been reformatted, with a little tweaking, and posted below (click to enlarge). The noted surveys clearly have their own drawbacks and limitations--we could spend hours critiquing the methodologies and usefulness of each of the surveys. Nevertheless, in most instances, the surveys do provide a fairly decent gauge of what is going on in the country. In the survey results, the only major objection I have is the Cambodia rating and rank in the EIU survey. The EIU survey rates Cambodia as the most vulnerable country in the region to unrest. It is even rated higher than Pakistan! I'm not sure if this is an error in reporting or there is something going on in Cambodia that I have missed. I suspect a misreporting since the last EIU risk report on Cambodia started with, "The CPP will remain politically dominant in 2009-10. At the last general election, in July 2008, the CPP tightened its grip on power, winning 90 of the 123 seats in the National Assembly. The CPP consolidated its position in May this year, when it won around 75% of the vote in the first ever election for members of provincial and district councils." It would also have been nice if Reuters had provided a date on the IHS Survey, and expanded on the number of countries listed. Also note the choice of adjectives to describe Thaksin (fugitive). In addition to the above report, Reuters has a long piece on how politics is (and in some cases is not) affecting the Thai economy. Here is an excerpt, Foreign investors are wading back into Thailand despite a three-year political crisis, stoking stock and currency gains, but economists say political unrest will limit how fast and how far Thailand pulls out of recession.
Related Stories“Defeating Political Islam” (story by Atanu Dey on India's Development) Political bombshell explodes in Sabah (story by Screenshots) The Secret Political Blog: Moving to Asian Correspondent (story by The Secret Political Blog) PETER GARRETT, POLITICAL OPPORTUNIST (story by RWDB - JF Beck) Giles on the Political Crisis : Thaksin Clique vs PAD Clique (story by Bangkok Pundit) Thailand: Fighting over Democracy (story by Bangkok Pundit) CommentsNo comments yet. |
![]() ![]() A rural police officer who dares to seek justice UPDATE ![]() Manny hugs the limelight, Richie tips the scales ![]() Media reports on the red shirts ![]() Should Abhisit resign or dissolve parliament to satisfy the red shirts? ![]() The forest surrounding the town ![]() Clashes continue in row over Indonesia's Century Bank bailout ![]() Temasek's Malaysian governance problem: what happened next ![]() New travel website opens borders across Asia |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||