Comment It |

|

Email it

Print it

Related Stories

Worrying message on Internet Malaysia (story by Screenshots)
BULLETS DELIVER POLITICAL MESSAGE (story by RWDB - JF Beck)
Is Cambodia monitoring the Thai embassy? (story by Bangkok Pundit)
Philippine militiamen and occult groups of the past (story by Chronicles from Mindanao by a Mindanao Journalist)
The face-off between India and China (story by Breaking News)
Air superiority in the Asia Pacific region (story by My Singapore News)

Comments

by Anonymous on 01/03/2010 03:02 am

Random note: HMK's Prussian-educated father was an early advocate of U-boat warfare, and tried to get the Siamese Navy to purchase some. However, The Prince of Songkhla wasn't considered very powerful at the time and the WWI-era Siamese Navy was dominated by British-educated princes who followed the Royal Navy strategy of buying warships instead. The Prince of Songkhla ended up resigning his Naval commission in frustration, decided to become a physician, and the rest is history...

Another random note: the most realistic use of submarines for Thailand would be to destroy Vietnamese shipping. Or conversely, to break a Vietnamese blockade of the Gulf of Siam. Let's not kid ourselves - Vietnam is Thailand's only credible enemy. Destroying Vietnamese shipping means submarine warfare outside of the Gulf. That being said, HMK has a valid point when noting that submarines would be of limited use in breaking a blockade of the Gulf.

by Ricefield Radio on 01/03/2010 06:52 am http://ricefieldradio.com

"how should one interpret this....." The same way that everyone always does. Select the parts you like and ignore the parts you don't. It's the Thai way.

by Anonymous on 01/03/2010 07:25 am

I don't think there is really any realistic use of submarines for the Thai Navy. The era where region powers like Thailand and Vietnam duke it out over some issues is long over. For the time being and for the foreseeable future, any armed conflicts will be minor border skirmishes, which may have great political ramifications, but are military inconsequential. No significant redrawing of boundaries are to be expected. Any major armed conflicts will only happen as proxy war between the world's great powers. Modern weaponry is too expensive and too sophisticated and cannot be produced locally. Thailand and her regional adversaries will deplete their arsenal in the first few weeks of war.
That said, armed procurement has its indirect use. Interoperability with allies is a good insurance. And though it may be distasteful, as a weak country technologically and diplomatically, Thailand still has to pay their dues to the military-industry complex of the great powers as an instrument of diplomacy.
So, while the submarine may not be particularly practical and useful, it may not be entirely useless if it helps maintain relationship vis a vis Russia.

by Anonymous on 01/03/2010 07:39 am

"No significant redrawing of boundaries are to be expected."

Speak for yourself. Thailand still longs after the territory it ceded to Cambodia due to the World Court, that it seized from French Indochina during WWII, that France seized in the Franco-Siamese War, ...

Cambodia itself is inconsequential. It's Vietnam, and the buffer to Vietnam, that is Thailand's issue.

by Reg on 01/03/2010 09:06 am

But think of the kickbacks of buying subs, old or new. The navy never does as well as the air force or army guys do. If my memory is not faulty, weren't the navy's last big purchases the Harriers that don't fly and the aircraft carrier that doesn't sail?

by Anonymous on 01/03/2010 07:51 pm

I don't pretend to be a military strategist, but would seem that in the long term Vietnam may be a better economic performer so more able to afford its "toys".

Seem to recall little love between Vietnam and China and Thailand moving more towards the China sphere. If the US really through banker greed and government corruption supporting said have stuffed their economy, then this will continue as Thais are opportunistic not loyal. Look at their history.

Most industry seems Chinese controlled anyway with Thais doing what they do best, sucking corruption payments out of the actually productive.

Vietnam despite the war actually seems a better fit to the US.

Name:

E-mail:
(optional)
Comment:

Allowed HTML tags: <B></B>, <I></I>, <A></A>

Are you human?