| Inside Scoop | Breaking News | Video | Blog Index | Participate | Humor | |
| Politics | Economics | New Media | Technology | Green Living |
By Madmue Bitbaak, A public ruckus has erupted after an advertisement focusing on the national political crisis has been banned. The Nation reports,
As to the reason why the censorship board has banned the controversial advertisement, The Nation says,
What is so deeply controversial and threatening to national security that the government doesn't want you to see it? Well ironically the video is getting over one-hundered thousand hits on YouTube and has been uploaded on to numerous Thai websites, even CRES has joined in! In case you haven't seen it, here it is with English translation below it (c/o The Nation):
"Did we do anything wrong? Did we handle anything too harshly? Did we listen to only one side of the story? Did we perform our duties? Did we really think of people? Were we corrupt? Did we take too much? Did the media make people better informed? Did our society deteriorate? Did we love money more than the rightness? And did we only wait for help? If there was anyone to blame, it would be all of us. Apologise Thailand. And if there was anyone who can fix the problems, it would be all Thais. Keep the loss in mind and turn it into our force." The government's "growing authoritarian image" received an additional boost over the weekend when police arrested Natee an attendee at a Ratchaprasong commemoration/re-enactment ceremony. Natee's arrest comes on the heels of last week's political arrest of Mirror founder Sombat Boonngamanong for tying a ribbon at Ratchaprasong in violation of the emergency decree. Not much yet in the press (Sunday?) on Natee, but Twitter has taken care of that with @terryfrd (BKK Post) and illustrious Thai tweetaholic @on_off_course. Natee reportedly is free on bail. Sombat has also reemerged at Ratchaprasong (YouTube video) Natee's "antics"--shouting he is here alone and not in defiance of the emergency law--is below:
Related StoriesIn Malaysia, the Government fears blogs (story by Rocky's Bru) Government Coalition: Rushed “High Level” Meeting on Big Jiew (story by Thai Intelligent News) Flushing Away a Million Dollars (story by Big White Guy) Record drought ravages southern China (story by GreenFudge) Western Australia gov't still badgering motorists despite fall in road deaths (story by RWDB - JF Beck) Australian government accused of pressuring refugee status reviewers (story by RWDB - JF Beck) Comments
Government denies banning the video: http://thainews.prd.go.th/en/news.php?id=255307180030 And here's the video on CRES own website: http://www.capothai.org/capothai/khxthos-prathesthiy
Version of the "apology" video with English sub-titles at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dNIu8_-iU8
Strikes me that its message is quite pro status quo really. Ignoring the sickly sweet voice over what I get from the last few images is the message is to get back to your buffalo peasants and leave the educated (images of libraries, teachers etc) to get on with business as usual... I'd imagine the objectionable content in it was simply that there is an attempt to apportion blame a little bit more even handedly. But promoting a genuine attempt at reconciliation is missing the point. The government and its allies need to find the people to blame. Scapegoats, conspiracies and subversion are the key points that should be emphasized and they haven't been here.
Funny how middle class Thais get more upset by the arrest of a couple activists and the banning of some crappy video (oh god, it's too awful for words) than the shooting dead of 90 of their fellow citizens.
Of course this is defamatory. By asking these questions without providing a definitive, the video dares to remind the public that the questions themselves are open-ended. And we can't have that! It simply would not do. We've got our UN Human Rights Council membership to consider, and only Abhisit's slick thinkspeak will keep us in the clear.
#Anonymous The message is even handed. Too even handed. It suggests everyone should take some of the blame. That of course includes the guy at the top. And I am not referring to to Prem. Intimating that this unmentionable person could do wrong is against the law. Or another way. The law is against this type of criticism.
Please utilize the spellcheck function before posting. The word is "ruckus." |
![]() ![]() 95 snakes found in burst bag at Malaysia airport ![]() China introduces ID check for mobile phone owners ![]() Meet Cambodia's anonymous blog author 'Details are Sketchy' ![]() Japan approves economic sanctions against Iran ![]() The art of demystifying wine ![]() Dolphins caught, not killed, in Japan cove ![]() French 'Spiderman' in Sydney court over climb ![]() Karzai: Afghan govt will back Kabul Bank |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||