| Inside Scoop | Breaking News | Video | Blog Index | Participate | Humor | |
| Politics | Economics | New Media | Travel and Lifestyle | Technology | Education | Green Living |
In the past, former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra and Thai Rak Thai were known as nationalists, but well if Thaksin was a nationalist, he often faced criticism for selling out the country. Social critic Prawase Wasi and The Manager stated Thaksin murdered the country when he sold Shin Corp. Prominent author Chris Baker has noted:
BP: Would disagree slightly. Thaksin was more nationalistic prior to the 2001 general election ranting on about the IMF etc, but once he became PM, he made a couple of similar speeches - there is one notable speech around April 2001 (can't find the exact speech now, but remember concern being expressed in the foreign business community). After that, he gradually toned down his rhetoric. Would also say that Thaksin turned more neoliberal in regards to free trade agreements well before 2004 - some details of the free trade agreements and criticism of Thaksin is mentioned in this post from 2005. Of course last year during the time of the Thaksin-aligned PPP-led government the opposition Democrats and the anti-Thaksin PAD were using nationalist rhetoric to criticize PPP over Preah Vihear - see here, here and here. Now, we hae more of the same. Have summarised an article today from Matichon below:
BP: Who are the nationalists now? No wonder those at The Nation like the Democrats.
Related StoriesAircel 1-2-3 and Tata Indicom’s pay-per-call. Are the telcos killing each other? (story by Indianomics) Heritage Penang... who calls the shot? (story by Screenshots) Attempted murder: Who are the 31? (story by Screenshots) Who told the Japs? Pt II (story by The ShadowLands) Who is This "Journalist"? (story by Bangkok Pundit) Are the Insurgents Willing to Negotiate? (story by Bangkok Pundit) Comments
Well, as noted previously, attaching the "traitor" label is clearly the flavour of last month, this month and many more months to come if the likes of Abhisit and his excitable spokesmen have their way. Are you truly Thai and love your country? Or are you really a wannabe (arghhhhh!)... foreigner? Are you now or have you ever been...... a less-than convinced Thai patriot? Insane and laughable - but plainly more silliness to come. If French fries had to become "freedom fries", who knows what these people can come up with? For some light relief, sample a song from the British (I should say English) satirist duo Flanders & Swann. For now, just the chorus: The English, the English the English are best - I wouldn't give tuppence for all of the rest!
I just don't see Thaksin's logic in accepting the position. I don't see the upside but a lot of downside risk. By the way, Bangkok Post and the Nation seem to be pouring champagne (front page BKPost)over this recent Abac poll showing a massive jump in "support" for the government--said to be the result of the government's "decisive action" on the Cambodia issue and the Thaksin appointment. I checked the poll and have my own commentary--interested to hear if others are buying the two papers assessment of the poll methodology, etc.
BP -- The speech I believe you are referring to was at the opening of an ESCAP conference in Bangkok in which he said, "We are looking inward to our original strengths, unique local know how, and matching them with new marketing and communications technology." http://www.unescap.org/57/press/l_13_01.htm NB -- According to government officials with knowledge of the situation, the speech was not the one provided him by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. That speech was discarded by a trusted senior adviser and the speech that was delivered was one prepared by said same senior adviser. As the story goes, Thaksin saw the speech for the very first time when he was at the podium. Perhaps this explains why the rhetoric subsequently was toned down.
Thaksin the businessmen knows no borders, Thaksin the politician had to make his people proud, hence his regional and global ambitions, anti IMF rhetoric etc. To be a nationalist you have to identify yourself with the nation. Thaksin sees half the country as sworn enemies instead, or pretends that they don't exist at all. The way various sides, including PAD, has been presented in this conflict, there aren't real nationalists here yet, they are still within the boundaries of healthy patriotism. The situation on the Cambodian side is totally different. I think they are all insane. |
![]() ![]() While Manny hugs the limelight, Richie quietly tips the scales ![]() The forest surrounding the town ![]() Should Abhisit resign or dissolve parliament to satisfy the red shirts? ![]() Foreign professor arrested on drug charges ![]() Elk coming out to greet spring ![]() Pretext for checkpoints and stoking fear ![]() What Singapore could learn from Rupert Murdoch ![]() Taxpayer-funded activists making stuff up |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||