Inside Scoop Breaking News Video Blog Index Participate Humor
Home The ShadowLands Law-men at work Down Under
+ Follow Me

The ShadowLands

Gavin Atkins

Location: Sydney, Australia

My Posts | My RSS feed


Law-men at work Down Under

Law-men at work Down Under
+ enlarge
Feb. 09 2010 - 04:19 am
View comments (1)


Something about the court case where Men at Work were found to have ripped off a children’s song for their worldwide hit Down Under just isn’t right.

It’s obvious, yes, that Men at Work borrowed the tune, Kookaburra for parts of the song. The give-away is at the 52 second mark of the above video, where…well, have a look and you’ll get it.

Unlike other artists, Men at Work never ripped off a tune and pretended to call it their own, they incorporated a kids’ tune and added it to the fabric of their work.

It’s clear that there was no masterplan by Men at Work to steal a tune and make a killing from it - Down Under was originally released as a B-side on their first single when they were still a struggling band from Melbourne. The Australian children’s song suited Down Under’s theme of a nation’s innocence and optimism, and their innocence and optimism no doubt led them to believe Kookaburra was part of the public domain.

The composer of Kookaburra, Melbourne music teacher, Marion Sinclair never sought royalties from Men at Work during her lifetime,  possibly because she was an Australian who didn’t believe the world owed her a living, and possibly because – it is said – her song borrowed elements from an old Welsh folk tune. Instead, the music publishers stepped into the fray after she died.

One of the themes of Down Under was that Australia was a refuge from the rest of the world (“You’d better run, you’d better take cover.”)

Ironically, it turns out the thing to run from was copyright laws. As suggested in a comment over here it is believed copyright laws that worked in the music publisher's favour in this case came to Australia as part of the wheelings and dealings for a US-Australia free trade deal.

The thing that doesn’t sit quite right is that Men at Work, in good faith, were creative and ultimately gave something to Australia and the public at large. They got lucky and made money out of it – so good for them.

The people suing them, on the other hand, appear to be opportunists who have not created anything.

Judgment for damages has not yet been made, but I humbly submit that the legal profession might yet salvage some honour if the music publishers are awarded costs, a can of Fosters (if anyone can find one) and a vegemite sandwich.



  Comment It |     |    Email it    Print it   


Related Stories


Aussie '80s hit 'Down Under' 'copies kids' song' (story by Breaking News)


Comments



by Greed Makes Us Chunder
on 02/09/2010 05:59 pm

Let's accept that the flute piece uses that tune (which is obvious) ,regardless of intention, using a tiny piece of a tune and song so many of us learnt and sang gustily as children. Could there have been a better choice to use an iconic bridging piece in a song that is one of the few popular international musical tunes that Australia can boast of ? A nod to an iconic tune that is stamped in the hearts and minds of so many of us. This song screams Australiana at the listener. It does it proudly and without apology . It does it without cringe but with tongue firmly planted in cheek. How many songs can be said to have achieved that in the big pond that is the world stage ?
As little faith as I have in the Aus. legal system I believe that on appeal commonsense will prevail and this decision will land where it deserves. Firmly on its arse ... I mean "Down Under ".




Name:

E-mail:
(optional)
Comment:

Allowed HTML tags: <B></B>, <I></I>, <A></A>
Are you human? 




designed by Fusion